1. Why do you think you are the best potential nominee for the 4th Senate Seat?
I am the best candidate for this seat for several reasons. First, I am committed to the 4th District and the people who live here. While some of the other people who are attempting to garner your support may view this position as a springboard for a different office, I will stay as long as my constituents continue to approve of my job. Second, I have a long history of delivering results to my constituents. Obviously, I would like to see the Democrats become the majority in the Senate and the House, however while we are the minority, it is important to choose someone who can work with Republicans. Since I started working in
2. How would you approach representing a district as diverse as the 4th Senatorial?
The 4th Senatorial district is not as diverse as divisive politicians want us to believe. We are significantly democratic and strongly value the same platforms. The people we live next to want better healthcare, a robust economy, nicer schools, and renewable energy sources. As your senator I will use my office and voice to guarantee that our collective interests are well defended and advanced in the capitol. The best way to represent our differing opinions is through access. I have always been especially accessible to all of my constituents. Whether they want to contact my office, home, or meet in person, I enjoy and respond to the requests of everyone in the district.
3. How will you effectively represent Democratic interests in
As I said above, I work well with both my Democratic and Republican colleagues. When you are deciding who you want to send to
4. What is your position on local control of the police department? Would you sponsor a bill establishing local control?
In my opinion, it is ridiculous that 25% of the city’s annual budget goes to a police force that they do not have direct authority over. With power centered in city hall, the police force will be more efficient and effective. If you choose to support me, I will sponsor and push for legislation establishing local control.
5. How would you propose to solve the budget problem of increasing pension costs for City of
The budget problem should be addressed with a two tier solution. First,
6. How would you work to foster economic development in the City of
There are two issues that I think your senator should fight for. First,
7. As State Senator, what could you do to improve the educational system in the City of
Education is the linchpin to quality of life. I firmly believe that every person in
8. Missouri lags behind many states in terms of alternative energy, energy efficiency, etc. What are your views on these and other environmental issues?
I am firmly committed to advancing green technology as a means to provide people a better quality of life. Wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, and solar technologies have so much potential to meet all of our energy needs, without the destructive costs currently hurting our planet. As your senator I can promise that if legislation creates real opportunities for
9. As State Senator, what could you do to improve health insurance / care in
Ever since 2005, when Gov. Blunt’s budget cuts decimated our state’s health care infrastructure, the people of
Here is the Op-Ed:
We’ve had these conversations on health care before…
In 1912 Theodore Roosevelt campaigned for the presidency by advocating national health insurance. President Truman called on Congress for a health care overhaul in 1945. As the same problems continued, President Nixon backed reform efforts to mandate that employers offer a minimum level of insurance to employees. On the campaign trail in 1976, Jimmy Carter demanded “a comprehensive national health insurance system with universal and mandatory coverage.” Like his predecessors, President Clinton recognized that the deficiencies in the health care system were not being alleviated by ignoring them and in 1993 created a taskforce assessing possible solutions.
I could cite many more times when the issue has been broached with only minimal progress, but the point is clear: Democrats and Republicans alike for nearly the last century have submitted proposals to change the way this country uses and views health care. Each time detractors and cynics denounced the efforts as “socialism” or worse and were able to derail practical solutions.
Now, the health care system is as weak and inefficient as ever before. Almost 50 million Americans are uninsured, with another 25 million being under-insured. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation reports that the cost of health insurance increased 30 percent from 2001-2005. Yet during the same time period people’s income only increased by 3 percent. Almost 50 percent of people filing for bankruptcy do so because of the devastating cost of health care. These numbers speak for themselves about the inexcusable continuance of our current methods.
To those people who use mistruths and half-truths to advance themselves at the expense of others, to those people who would incite the primitive fears of people with lies without concern for the well being of others, to those people who have no objective other than to perpetuate the status quo and leave millions of others suffering, my message to you is simple: Stop.
Surely in a country predicated on discussion and debate, we can sit down, isolate our differences and work towards a common solution. Instead of devolving into shoving and shouting, research and reason should prevail. With an open-mind and a predisposition of patience, we as a citizenry can alleviate this discourse into pragmatic options.
The people of
10. What is your long-term commitment to this position? Do you plan to seek re-election?
It would be an honor serving the people of the 4th District, and if they continue to approve of my job in